Coal & End of Oil

21 02 2007

These two books look at the history of human interaction with these two hydrocarbon energy sources which are central to our lives. The combined review was published in Down to Earth in 2006.

Barbara Freese, Coal: A Human History, Arrow Books, London, 2003;

Paul Roberts, The End of Oil: The decline of the petroleum economy and the rise of a new energy order, Bloomsbury, London, 2005.

~ ~ ~

Hydrocarbons define our civilisation. Below the massive changes that the world has seen in the past three or four centuries, lie massive seams of coal and oceans of oil. Not science and technology, not capitalism and colonialism, not even the famous Enlightenment, but coal and subsequently, petroleum, are the foundations of modern life.

Surprisingly, and rather unfortunately, very little attention has ever been focused on understanding the role of hydrocarbons in our society. There have been many technical and scientific papers and books on coal and petroleum but very little to understand the social impact of the use of these hydrocarbons, other than perhaps activist literature against the omissions and commissions of the oil industry.

It has only been in the last few years that people have started looking seriously at these issues. Most of these studies have been influenced by the “Peak Oil” theory and have been fuelled in recent years by the wars over oil and the sharp rise in global oil prices. There are as yet few attempts to study the manner in which hydrocarbons and their derivatievs have become an integral part of our daily lives, have become irreplacable to our existance as they silently power our ideas and ideologies.

The two books under reivew attempt to do just that. Barbara Freese’s is an excellent social history of coal; its emergence as a fuel of importance in late medieval Europe (mainly England), the manner in which it impacted on the industrial revolution, how it changed urban landscapes, lifestyles, working conditions, conduct of warfare and how it continues to underwrite much of modern life despite the abdication of “King Coal” in favour of oil and why it will continue to power our lives despite the concerns of pollution and climate change. The range and scope of her work is quite impressive as she straddles the globe with wide and varied themes related to coal. Another strenght of this book is Freese’s ability to argue the centrality of coal in understanding the “progress” of the industrial world without falling into the trap of determinism, specially of the technological variety.

Paul Roberts’ is a much more ambitious attempt. Through his detailed examination of the role oil plays in our lives, Roberts attempts to show how deep our collective addiction is to this non renewable resource and how difficult it will be to make the transition for our oil (or hydrocarbon) economy into something other. Not only does this book provide a detailed acount of how and why oil plays such a central role in modern life, it also explains why it has become so difficult for governments to bring in policies which reduce the role of oil in our life. Roberts successfully manages to argue that it is not only the much maligned oil companies and geo-politics of the superpowers, but the very fabric of our daily lives which makes it so difficult to move beyond petroleum (and hydrocarbons at a more general level).

What Paul Roberts, and to a lesser extent Barbara Freese, have done is to implicate all of us — oil company executives, environmental activists, government players, political rebels, armchair academics, industrialists, consumers, everyone — within the hydrocarbon economy and made it impossible for anyone to shift blame, guilt and resposibility to others. These books are important also because the larger issues related to the use of and addiction to non-renewable energy has never been a part of public debate or discussion.

It is not only the cars and busses and planes which will be affected with the depletion of oil (though that in itself can disrupt the entire structure of modern life), but electricity generation, agriculture, medicine and a myriad other things.

India cannot feed its billion plus population without hydrocarbon derivatives powering its agriculture. Not only is the fertiliser and pesticide derived from petroleum and natural gas, water is pumped and farm inputs and labour transported to the field with the help of coal or oil. This food in turn reaches consumers with the help of further hydrocarbon use. Rather than be called the Green Revolution, the quantum jump in farm productivity in the 1960s should be called the Black Revolution, as it was powered by the black gold of petroleum. In fact, one does not have to be a Malthusian to recognise the impossibility of feeding this planet’s 6.5 billion people without fertilizer and pesticide based agriculture. It is impossible to grow the amounts of foodgrain required to feed this multitude if the soil is not supercharged with huge quantities of hydrocarbon based fertilisers. A study in the United States in the 1970s had shown that one calorie of hydrocarbon energy was being used to generate one calorie of food. With increased mechanisation of farming activities and the food chain, dependence on hydrocarbons has surely increased manifold. It may not be an exxageration to state that we are actually eating oil when we have our dal-roti.

It is not just agriculture. Oil and its derivatives surround us at every moment of our lives. Just take five minutes right now and list all the plastic you can see within the room. From pens and watches, to laptops and phones, to kitchen utensils and shoes, the list is practically endless. You may just about be wearing petroleum if you have a nylon saree on. Similar is the list for medicines and other uses of oil (and coal).

The reason behind the use of hydrocarbons becoming so widespread is quite well known — Coal and Oil are basically huge stores of ancient solar energy compressed into a relatively small volume. Scientists often express it as energy production ratio or EPR. This measures how much energy was returned compared to the energy invested or energy outpu / energy input. For human society to survive it was essential to find and harness energy sources where the EPR was higher than 1. Prior to the discovery of coal, and later oil, the only way in which solar power could be harnessed was through agriculture and other primary production which converted the sun’s energy into food and other products like wood and fodder. There was also the conversion of solar powre through windmills and of hydropower though wate mills (gravity). But the EPR in all these ranged between 1.1 to 1.2. Therefore, pre-modern life was marked by drudgery, hard labour and an inability to move too far from nature.

Coal, with its EPR above 1.5 even for the worst varieties and most inefficient burnings, was a quantum jump in the energy surplus it provided. It provided levels of energy which was as yet unprecedented along with high levels of portability and therefore could fire the industrial revolution. Oil, which was discovered and brought into use only after the consolidation of the coal driven industrial revolution, had a base EPR of 2 and above. Some estimations state that energy equivalent to only one barrel of oil was needed to bring a 100 barrels of this wonderous liquid to the consumer when petroleum was first drilled in Saudi Arabia! It was this huge energy surplus which has been the magic behind the miracle of modern life.

But it was not merely this wonderous physical property which enabled coal and oil to fuel the industrialised society. It also required a smart sleight of hand by the market and its priests –the economists, to make hydrocarbons so inexpensive. Cheap fuel has been the key to the modern world. The miracle of the market is the price it puts on each commodity that comes into its domain. This price, we are told, determines the value society puts on that commodity while at the same time covering the cost of its production. While this is true of most commodities which are continuously manufactured, such a pricing mechanism fails for non-renewable commodities like coal and oil. Each kilogram of coal or each litre of oil which is burnt is irreplacable, non-renewable. Once consumed it is gone forever, it cannot be recreated. The fact that Earth’s sinews contained about 2 trillion barrels of oil produced a simulation of infinity and enabled the cheap pricing of these crucial commodities. “Production” of coal or oil is calculated only on the basis of how much can be brought to the market at any given time. But non-renewable products are, in that sense, priceless since once used it can never be got back.

When the consumption of hydrocarbon commodities was much below the total reserves, this illusion of infinity and consequent low prices could be kept intact. But today when we have consumed almost half the total oil inside the Earth and such illusions are increasingly turning into nightmares. The present world is so completely dependent on oil that it is practically impossible to shift to another, equally powerful yet inexpensive, energy source. This is the basis for the strong political consensus, accross countries and ideologies, on keeping oil prices low. As the demand for hydrocarbons keeps spiralling and the political compulsions keep prices low, we will continue to use up the remaining reserves at ever faster rates, making the eventual shift to a non-hydrocarbon economy that much more traumatic and difficult.

The normal answer for the end of (cheap) oil is to point to alternative sources of energy. Unfortunately, this belief that science and technology will find us deliverance is akin to religious belief in spiritual deliverance. At present there is no viable alternative energy source. Hydrogen, the much touted savior, actually has an EPR lower than 1 when used as a fuel; as do many other alternatives like biodiesel and, perhaps, even nuclear, which in any case is extremely hazardous and equally non-renewable. Only wind energy has a high EPR. But almost all these alternative sources of energy are only for electricity which cannot be easily stored nor is it portable like coal or oil. Even if one can imagine land transport based on electricity, planes cannot fly without oil, nor can electricity produce the fertilisers, plastics and other products which oil provides us. To still believe that technology will find some solution, is to be delusional.

This is precisely why books like these are essential readings for every citizen of this planet today. Unless we diagnose and unravel the ways in which we have imbricated hydrocarbons into our very existance, it would be near impossible to work towards a post-carbon economy and social order. The question is not if oil ends, but when will oil end and how will we deal with the necessary transition to the non-oil age.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: